A Camera is Not a Weapon
by Nicolette Good
Alicia Wagner Calzada (J.D. ’10) spent two decades behind her camera lens as a photojournalist, capturing some of the most devastating, exciting and momentous events for magazines and newspapers.
But it’s what unfolded off camera that has become her life’s work.
Early in Alicia Calzada’s career as a self-employed photographer, someone stole her photograph.
“They used my picture without my permission, and I didn’t know what to do,” she said. “I did not know how to protect myself or the things I should have done beforehand to protect myself.”
She previously had been a staffer for newspapers and magazines across the country, but as a newly independent photographer, she had to handle the business side of the industry for the first time.
With no legal department to back her up, she turned to her trade organization, the National Press Photographers Association (NPPA), to educate herself on copyrights, contracts and running her own business. At that time, the NPPA didn’t offer many resources in this area, so it urged her to take the lead.
She delved into these topics, even helping develop a cost-of-doing-business calculator that gave self-employed photographers a helpful, if sobering, look at their overhead and profits.
But around the same time, photographers around the country were beginning to face an even bigger problem.
A camera is not a weapon
It did not take long following 9/11 for journalists and citizens with camera phones to be increasingly harassed in the name of security. From news reporters photographing government officials to pedestrians recording what looked like an unlawful arrest, the stories grew more and more common.
“There is a misconception among police, security guards and people who are in charge of keeping us safe that somehow a camera is a risk,” said Calzada.
Calzada is passionate about the Constitution’s First Amendment, which protects the freedom of speech and of the press. She emphasizes that if a person is lawfully present in a public space, he or she has every right to take photographs and to record video of anything in plain sight, whether a media badge is worn or not.
Today, there are countless websites and blogs dedicated to reporting instances of people being wrongfully detained, arrested and even assaulted because they were taking photos or video.
“The right to take pictures is not something exclusive to journalists,” she said. “All constitutional rights apply to everyone. There are no special people that get the privilege of the First Amendment.”
When rights are threatened
To her, the cause was personal. In 2005, she was shooting on location in New Orleans when Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) officials essentially told her to turn a blind eye to some of the devastation she witnessed.
“While I was covering Hurricane Katrina, FEMA was trying to tell photographers they couldn’t photograph dead bodies. I was president of the NPPA during that time, so it came to me to speak out against FEMA’s efforts to block us.”
Calzada is the founder of the NPPA’s advocacy committee, which defends photographers’ rights and interests, and tracks national trends in how the media is being granted or denied access.
Similarly, her committee joined a national outcry when the New Jersey and New York transit authorities tried to ban photography in their stations. And in the early 2000s, when the National Football League tried to remove television affiliates and photographers from game sidelines, she sent letters to nearly every team and league in objection.
The more she learned about the legal issues surrounding her field, the more she found herself trying to educate other photographers on the law. But she wasn’t an attorney.
“It occurred to me that if I really wanted to do this, to help others learn about the law, then I should be a lawyer.”
Taking back the First Amendment
Now equipped with a law degree from St. Mary’s and decades of experience behind the camera, Calzada works in First Amendment media law, defamation suits and copyright defense as an attorney with Haynes and Boone, LLP in San Antonio.
“My passion for the First Amendment … is about helping journalists do their work,” she said. “The news media is a critical part of our democracy, and it’s really at risk right now.”
Her firm often lobbies on behalf of journalists, and one of its successes was helping push Texas’ Anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) Law.
“A SLAPP suit is a lawsuit designed to shut someone up,” explains Calzada. “A newspaper might get sued for defamation because someone doesn’t like what it wrote.”
Texas’ Anti-SLAPP law is now one of the country’s strongest laws protecting individuals from lawsuits aimed at intimidating and silencing them. Not long after its passing, that law helped her firm successfully defend a local news station against such a suit.
Today she represents corporations, journalists and the NPPA — but she still sticks up for the little guy. Case in point, a Chicago newspaper laid off dozens of its staff photographers this year, so Calzada flew to Illinois to coach them on the transition to independent and freelance photography.
Projects on the horizon for Calzada include finding a small-claims solution for copyright infringement cases and promoting the Free Flow of Information Act in hopes of protecting journalists from improper intrusion into the media.
And when she thinks about the ever-changing landscape in which photographers do business — online, on Facebook and on smartphones — she’s hopeful.
“I’m not convinced that people’s rights are changing,” Calzada said. “The legal principles are the same; the tools are just a little different.”
“There is a misconception among police, security guards and people who are in charge of keeping us safe that somehow a camera is a risk.”